Saturday, October 25, 2008

Czech Female Child-Torturers Escape With Lenient Sentences

A cannibal cult mother who tortured her son in a locked cellar while relatives skinned him and forced him to eat his own flesh has been jailed for nine years.

Story here

Klara Mauerova, 31 - a member of a sinister religious cult and her sister Katerina led the sickening torture of her eight-year-old son Ondrej and his ten year-old brother Jakub.

A court in Brno in Czech Republic heard how relatives partially skinned Ondrej and forced him to eat his own flesh.

The judge also jailed Katerina, 35, for ten years for her role in the sickening abuse.

The two boys had told judges how their mother and relatives had stubbed cigarettes out on their bare skin, whipped them with belts, and tried to drown them. They were also sexually abused and forced to cut themselves with knives.

The terrified youngsters said they were kept in cages or handcuffed to tables and made to stand in their own urine for days.
The sick abuse was discovered when a neighbour installed a TV baby monitor to keep watch on his new daughter.

But it picked up the signal from an identical monitor next door showing one of the victims beaten, naked and chained in a cellar.

Mauerova had installed it so she could gloat over her victims' suffering from the comfort of her kitchen.

Nine years? Is that a joke? No. It's called the pussy discount.

It is interesting to compare this case with that of the Austrian Josef Fritzl. It is unthinkable that Fritzl will ever be released from prison. Yet the Mauerova sisters' crimes were arguably worse. The abuse did not continue for as long, but it seems to have been vastly more violent and sadistic. Fritzl did not skin his own children alive and force them to eat their own flesh. Crimes do not really come any worse than that. But look at the sentence. Nine years.

The other interesting thing to notice is that women like this operate in small groups, egging each other on, covering each other's stories. Men like Fritzl tend to work alone.

The most interesting thing of all to notice is the difference in the level of press coverage given to the cases. Where is the Guardian'coverage? Where is the BBC's? I haven't been able to find any. There is something to be said for the tabloids. They do not subject themselves to ideological censorship in this way. Ironically, these politically-corrected news sources regard themselves as 'liberal'. In fact, they are the least liberal news sources we have.

I suppose we should be grateful that these women are in prison at all. If certain British feminists had their way, there would not be any women's prisons at all.


JimmyGiro said...

Speaking of 'liberal media', I noticed that these organs were predicting great things for Jill Sawards' 'Rape Awareness' campaign during the Haltemprice by-election.

But as soon as she lost her deposit, they dropped her like yesterdays proverbial:

SellCivilizationShort said...

Thanks for bringing this to attention.