Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Female Paedophilia Coming to Light at Last

On the day that Vanessa George is to be sentenced, yet another female 'predatory paedophile' is sent down.

Carol Clarke, 46, assaulted children she followed into toilets in Grimsby and other parts of Lincolnshire, she told detectives.

Grimsby Crown Court heard she was sexually aroused by watching young children urinate and from seeing them looking distressed when they needed to go to the toilet.

Sentencing Clarke, Judge David Tremberg yesterday told her she would have to serve a minimum of four year in prison.
Reference

This raises a few issues. Firstly, what is the point of sentencing people like that to shortish prison sentences, only to have them re-offend on release? What they need is some kind of psychiatric treatment, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, to try to end their sexual interest in children. In the meantime, they need to be contained for the safety of the public.

Secondly, the George case in particular calls into question the government's authoritarian, panic-stricken response, in insisting on Criminal Records Bureau checks for every adult who comes into contact with children. Vanessa George had passed a CRB check. Ian Huntley had never taken one, but had he taken one, he would have passed it. The government's measures constitute a frightening new level of state interference in the family, while doing little or nothing to protect children.

More importantly, what does the feminist movement have to say on the subject of Vanessa George and Carol Clark? Nothing. All I hear is a deafening silence. Crickets chirping. Facts like these are inconvenient for the self-serving, crypto-fascist ideologues who constitute the feminist movement.

The fact is that the feminist movement has been endorsing and concealing paedophiles for years in just the same way that the Catholic Church has. What matters to these organisations - the only thing that matters to them - is their reputations. For decades, the feminist movement has actively promoted the lie that all women are compassionate angels of mercy, and all men are savage, dangerous monsters. This poisonous mythology has been used as an instrument to break up marriages and families, and to separate men from women and children. This may serve the interests of the handful of Marxist lesbians who dominate the movement, but it does not serve anyone else's interests.

Female paedophiles like these in the news are an important type of counter-evidence, which is why we must draw maximum attention to them. The feminist movement just does not know what to say about them. It just has to hope that the rest of us will not notice. The best story they can come up with is usually that it wasn't really her fault, a bad man made her do it.

By denying the existence of this kind of behaviour, the feminist movement is hindering efforts to protect children. It is not only self-serving and dishonest, it is about as deeply socially irresponsible as it is possible to imagine.

Come on feminists! Tell us why it is that some women commit sexual offences! Stop pretending it doesn't happen!

4 comments:

BrusselsLout said...

The issue surrounding paedophiles is a rather disturbing one, not least when you ask yourself, where were they all before 1980?

Ah, but that's because nobody knew about them before then! This is what Mr & Mrs EveningStandard will be quick to point out. It was the tabloids that "raised awareness" of their existence.

The thing is, everyone seems paranoid that paedophiles are hiding everywhere yet no one seems to know of even a friend of a friend of a friend who might have come across one in real life. (No doubt they exist, but they just don't seem that common.)

So why all the government fuss about them?

Mr & Mrs EveningStandard will quickly respond again that the government only wants to protect children.

And here's where the argument falls over. Why have the goverment not taken the steps to raise awareness of FEMALE paedophiles?

Answer: because, like male ones they are SCARCE. (The women may be as common as the men, but that would also make them equally scarce.) The government KNOWS that paedophiles are rare.

So why all the fuss then?

Because public mistrust, unease and hatred are exactly what give the government democratic support for strengthing police powers, building more prisons and introducing Asbos. This is what gives them more CONTROL.

Look at another instance of this. Some years ago in the UK news was the issue of "benefit scroungers", people who work while claiming government benefits illegally. Tony Blair, the then prime minister, was actually encouraging people to report to the authorities anyone (such as a friend) who they knew to be a benefit scrounger.

All right, we would all agree the scrounging benefits should not be encouraged. But to create more distrust? And even to go as far as breaking up friendships to achieve it?

The government's aim is control, and the only way to achieve it without sending in the military as Stalin might have is to get public support for it through the democratic system.

Anonymous said...

I don't know why, but most people don't know at all that the government is their deadliest enemy.

Nothing is more acid and dangerous than a government. Governments are the planet's excrements.

Anonymous said...

" The thing is, everyone seems paranoid that paedophiles are hiding everywhere yet no one seems to know of even a friend of a friend of a friend who might have come across one in real life. (No doubt they exist, but they just don't seem that common.)"

They aren't that common, just don't tell the feminists this as they will swear there's a man waiting around every corner and under every rock, wating to violate people's children.

"So why all the government fuss about them?"

Money made off of incarcerating them,almost exclusively the males.

"Mr & Mrs EveningStandard will quickly respond again that the government only wants to protect children".

Mr & Mrs EveningStandard,as well as most people of the public, are clueless. Here in Tennessee, we have DHS ( Department of Human services) and CPS (Child Protective Services). Neither of these two entities have done anything to really protect children from harm. I myself, as a child was raped, tortured, beaten, abused and, almost murdered in what was called "Tennessee's finest and best foster home. This after being "legally" kidnapped by the state because of the words of a bunch of liars, who haven't the decency or bravery to show their faces to me.

"Why have the goverment not taken the steps to raise awareness of FEMALE paedophiles"?

Heaven FORBID the government "victimize" some poor woman who preys on people's children. You know that wouldn't be "PC" (sarcasm).

"Because public mistrust, unease and hatred are exactly what give the government democratic support for strengthing police powers, building more prisons and introducing Asbos. This is what gives them more CONTROL".

BINGO! It is also a good excuse to raise taxes.

"So why all the fuss then"?

IMHO, it is because the government has been trianed by feminists to attack only males.

" The government's aim is control, and the only way to achieve it without sending in the military as Stalin might have is to get public support for it through the democratic system".

Who do feminists think the government will devour after most,if not all males are destroyed?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I don't know why, but most people don't know at all that the government is their deadliest enemy.

Nothing is more acid and dangerous than a government. Governments are the planet's excrements.

4:15 AM
It has been said; the true power comes from behind the throne. Look at the people who back up everything the governemnt does.