Thursday, May 28, 2009

Harman Courts Feminazi Vote. Again.

Hatter Harmmen has a solution to the economic crisis. Put women in charge of banks. Apparently, if they were running things, we wouldn't be in this mess. How do we know that? Because Auntie Hattie says so. Have you ever heard anything so vacuous?

I wish it was only absurd, but it is far worse than that. The fact that a leading politician can stand up in Parliament and say something like that with complete impunity is a measure of just how profoundly damaged our society has become at the hands of feminists.

Imagine she had said "The problem with our banks is that they are run by Jews. If we put Anglo-Saxons in charge, everything would be fine".

This is exactly the kind of rhetoric you might have heard form German politicians in the 1930s. And yet this is exactly the same argument. It has the same logic, and proceeds from the same smug, bigoted, authoritarian, self-pitying mindset.

And yet where are the voices of protest? Where is the media campaign to oust her? I hear nothing.

What kind of moron would you have to be, if you were a woman, to be taken in by such tactics? "Oh yes, those awful men running the banks. Let's put some lovely women in charge instead". Interestingly, I haven't actually heard anyone agreeing with her.

I wonder how Auntie Hattie explains the fact that so many women politicians are up to their necks in the expenses scandal, with her feminist sister-in-arms Jacqui Smith claiming for her pay-per-view porn at taxpayers' expense? Hattie has been strangely quiet of late.

Smith tried to divert attention away from the scandal by saying that people are only picking on her because she is a woman. Is it just me, or does anyone else expect more from their politicians than this?

Such statements show the desperation of a dead government trying to divert attention away from its own death throes.

People are justly concerned about the rise of the loathsome BNP. But we should be placing the blame for this at the door of New Labour. Not only has it completely abandoned the indigenous working-class, the very people it was formed to represent, but even worse that that:

If it's OK for Hattie Harmmen to spout neo-fascist propaganda in the media, then why not Nick Griffin too? It is Labour and its feminist supporters who have set the precedent.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Oxford Feminism: Up Shit Creek Without a Padel

It is good to know that the scurrilous feminist harpie Ruth Padel has resigned in disgrace. This is the lying witch who managed to elbow her way into the job of Oxford Professor of Poetry by organising a smear campaign against her only rival Derek Walcott.

I saw some of her press conference this evening on Channel 4 news in which she did her best to appear to be apologising while not actually doing so. She ended her prepared statement by saying "I wish all the best to the next Professor of Poetry, and I hope she is a woman". As far as I am concerned, that is the same as saying "I hope it is a white person".

After that, Channel 4 chose, for some reason, to interview another 1970s feminist dinosaur, Libby Purvis, who has made a handsome living by spewing banal drivel on R4's Midweek.

Purvis defended Padel's actions and tried, in typical feminist style, to say that the whole affair was men's fault. First she blamed Walcott for pulling out of the race in the face of organised character assassination. He should have fought on. Maybe he had something to hide. Maybe he didn't really want the job.

Then she turned on Padel's former leading male supporters for abandoning her so readily. AC Grayling, Melvyn Bragg and others, who had backed Padel, sensibly disowned her on finding out what a scheming two-faced hag she really is. According to Purvis, the whole scandal is their fault.

The Channel 4 interviewer even challenged her on this, saying "So, it's all about boys, it's not about girls?".

Purvis then disingenuously turned up her nose and feigned offence. "I'm not going to play that boys against girls game", she sneered. Oh, really? What have you been doing all along? Why does Padel hope the next appointee is a woman?

The fact is, these scheming feminist harpies have been caught with their pants down, due to the actions of a few honest journalists. The whole episode shows feminists in their true sordid colours. When it comes down to it, these are people who can only succeed by lying and cheating. Unfortunately, for every time when they are caught red-handed, as on this occasion, there are hundreds of other times when they get away with it.

I couldn't care less about poetry, but just this once, I hope they appoint a man.

Monday, May 25, 2009

BBC on Domestic Violence Statistics

This recent BBC radio program examines the '1 in 4' claim, and finds it utterly baseless. It tries to look at the reality, but fails to mention male victims.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

False Accuser Gets Top Academic Job

There were two main candidates in the recent race to become Oxford University's new Professor of Poetry: Ruth Padel and Derek Walcott. Mr Walcott withdrew after newspapers and academics received anonymous letters accusing him of sexual misconduct over 20 years ago. Ms Padel was given the post. It has now emerged that Padel was responsible for the hate campaign against her rival, and calls are being made for her resignation. Reference.

Apparently Mr Walcott was involved in two sexual harrassment cases in the USA during the 1980s and 1990s. Given the political climate of feminist near-hysteria on campuses in the USA during the 1980s and 1990s, the accusation means nothing without corroborating evidence. It may well be that this man has been a serial victim of false accusations; once you have been accused, your reputation is tainted, so you are more likely to be accused again. It could be that Mr Walcott was falsely accused during the McCarthyist anti-male witch-hunt of the 1980s, and just to add insult to injury, those same false accusations are being used against him now in an attempt to deny him a job. We simply don't know.

What we do know is this:

  • The feminist movement is actively encouraging the use of false accusations against men as a means of destroying men's lives.
  • The rate of false accusations is now so high that any given accusation is not worth the paper it is written on.
  • False accusers generally escape punishment.
  • False accusations damage the interests of genuine victims.

What we also know is that 'Professor' Padel only got her job because she engaged in a sordid smear campaign against the only other candidate.

"It was reported that Ms Padel contacted at least two newspapers during the campaign for the post of Oxford professor of poetry, drawing attention to Mr Walcott’s past.

Mr Walcott, 79, withdrew from the race at what he called a ‘low and degrading attempt at character assassination’.

Labour peer Lord Bragg, who had backed Ms Padel, was said last night to have called for her resignation".

She should be fired at once, and subject to criminal investigation. I hope to see Mr Walcott suing her through the courts for defamation.

For further reading on the sexual harrassment hysteria on US campuses, see the following:

Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women, Christina Hoff Sommers, 1995

Heterophobia: Sexual Harassment and the Future of Feminism, Daphne Patai, 2000

Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies, Daphne Patai & Noretta Koertge, 2003.

What Price Utopia?: Essays on Ideological Policing, Feminism, and Academic Affairs, Daphne Patai, 2008.

Glenn Sacks interviews Daphne Patai MP3 format

Lynched by the Sisterhood Canadian academic Jeffrey Asher describes how he was persecuted by academic feminists for teaching a course representing men positively

Take Back the Campus: Top 10 Feminist Lies

Why Feminist Careerists Neutered Larry Summers
Unlike most religious fundamentalists, these feminists were pursuing a careerist, self-serving agenda. This cause can put money in their pockets.

Cab Driver sues False Accusers

A Canadian cab driver was falsely accused of sexual assault by four girls after they refused to pay the fare. Luckily for him, he had a video camera in the cab and was able to prove his innocence. The police refused to charge the girls, so he is now pursuing a civil action for damages.

Electronic surveillance is a valuable way of protecting yourself. It saved this man's life.